People v. Daniels CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 25, 2015C070580California18,503 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/25/15 P. v. Daniels CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C070580

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 10F08003)

v.

TOMMY GENE DANIELS,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Tommy Gene Daniels appeals following conviction on multiple counts of lewd or lascivious acts upon five child victims (Pen. Code, §§ 288, subd. (a), 667.61, subd. (e)(5)1) who were in his home for daycare or “respite care.”2 Defendant was sentenced to a determinate term of eight years consecutive to an indeterminate term of

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code in effect at the time of the charged offenses. 2 Respite care was described as a temporary live-in care for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.