David

Filed 6/26/15 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION EIGHT

BRANDON R. DAVID et al., B254914

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC510542) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

MEDTRONIC, INC., et al., [There is no change in judgment]

Defendants and Respondents,

GOOD CAUSE appearing, the opinion filed June 12, 2015, in the above entitled matter is hereby modified as follows:

1. Page 9, delete the sentence that reads: “On appeal, defendants do not argue that Dr. Michelson was directly involved with Infuse, but suggest that Dr. Michelson may have indirectly endorsed or promoted Infuse, in that Medtronic’s website states that Infuse incorporates technology developed by Dr. Michelson.” And replace it with the following sentence: “On appeal, plaintiffs do not argue that Dr. Michelson was directly involved with Infuse, but suggest that Dr. Michelson may have indirectly endorsed or promoted Infuse, in that Medtronic’s website states that Infuse incorporates technology…