People v. Daniels CA2/8

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 26, 2015B261777California703 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS

We detailed the underlying facts in a nonpublished opinion deciding Daniels’s direct appeal from the jury conviction (People v. Daniels, B208132, Aug. 31, 2009). Those facts are not at issue here. In December 2014, Daniels sought resentencing under Proposition 47. The trial court denied the petition. At a hearing on the petition, the court explained the matter was not eligible for resentencing under Proposition 47.

DISCUSSION

Appellant filed a timely notice of appeal. We appointed appellate defense counsel. On June 3, 2015, appellant’s appointed counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 (Wende). On the same day, we notified appellant by letter that he could submit within 30 days any ground of appeal,

These details were set forth in an unpublished opinion we issued in April 2013, affirming a trial court order denying Daniels’s petition for writ of certiorari (People v. Daniels, B242614, April 30, 2013), and in an unpublished opinion we issued in July 2014, affirming a trial court order denying Daniels’s petition for resentencing pursuant to Proposition 36, the Three Strikes Reform Act. (People v. Daniels,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.