Chmm

CHMM, LLC v. Freeman Marine Equipment, Inc.

Good Law
2015 D.A.R. 7416·791 F.3d 1059·2015 WL 3938078·2015 A.M.C. 2046·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11059
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 201513-35163California2,966 words

Opinion

Opinion

Kozinski, J.

The economic loss doctrine precludes recovery against a manufacturer for physical damage that the manufacturer’s defective product causes to the “product itself.” E. River S.S. Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc., 476 U.S. 858, 866-71 , 106 S.Ct. 2295 , 90 L.Ed.2d 865 (1986). But the manufacturer can be sued for physical damage the product causes to “other property.” Id. at 867-68 , 106 S.Ct. 2295 . We consider whether a vessel owner may sue for the physical damage a defective vessel component causes to property that the owner adds to the vessel before the vessel is delivered. Put another way, is property added by the owner to a vessel prior to the delivery of the vessel considered “other property”?.

I. Background

CHMM, LLC is the owner of M/Y JAMAICA BAY, a 59.5-meter luxury yacht. In 2006, CHMM contracted with Nobis-krug GmbH to “construct, equip, launch and complete [the yacht] at [Nobiskrug’s] shipyard and to sell and deliver [the yacht] to [CHMM]” for approximately €34.2 million. Nobiskrug subcontracted with Freeman Marine Equipment for the manufacture of a “weathertight” door for installation in the yacht. This door provided access from the foredeck to the interior…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.