Mira Overseas Consulting v. Muse Family Enterprises

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2015B254298MCalifornia2,868 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/30/15 (unmodified opinion attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MIRA OVERSEAS CONSULTING LTD., B254298

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC476282) v.

ORDER MODIFYING OPINION

MUSE FAMILY ENTERPRISES, LTD. AND DENYING PETITION FOR et al., REHEARING

Defendants and Appellants; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

CARMEN COPPLE SILVA, Individually and as Trustee, etc.,

Defendant and Respondent.

THE COURT:*

It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 2, 2015, be modified as follows:

On page 2, the first sentence of the last full paragraph, the words “(whom he later remarried),” are deleted so the sentence now reads:

Meanwhile, during the divorce proceedings, David’s former wife claimed that he hid assets from her, including the property.

There is no change in the judgment.

Plaintiff and respondent’s petition for rehearing is denied.

* BOREN, P. J. ASHMANN-GERST, J. CHAVEZ, J.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.