Mira Overseas Consulting v. Muse Family Enterprises
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJune 30, 2015B254298MCalifornia2,868 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 6/30/15 (unmodified opinion attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
MIRA OVERSEAS CONSULTING LTD., B254298
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC476282) v.
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
MUSE FAMILY ENTERPRISES, LTD. AND DENYING PETITION FOR et al., REHEARING
Defendants and Appellants; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
CARMEN COPPLE SILVA, Individually and as Trustee, etc.,
Defendant and Respondent.
THE COURT:*
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 2, 2015, be modified as follows:
On page 2, the first sentence of the last full paragraph, the words “(whom he later remarried),” are deleted so the sentence now reads:
Meanwhile, during the divorce proceedings, David’s former wife claimed that he hid assets from her, including the property.
There is no change in the judgment.
Plaintiff and respondent’s petition for rehearing is denied.