Eckler

Eckler v. Neutrogena Corp.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 1, 2015B253691California11,515 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 6/9/15 Certified for publication 7/1/15 (order attached)

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

KAY ECKLER, B253691

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. BC307288, JCCP4352) v.

NEUTROGENA CORPORATION,

Defendant and Respondent.

STEVE ENGEL, B253899

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. Nos. BC307288, JCCP4352) v.

NEUTROGENA CORPORATION et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, John S. Wiley, Jr., Judge. Affirmed. Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint (Arizona) and Patricia N. Syverson; Bonnett, Fairbourn, Friedman & Balint (California) and Manfred P. Meucke for Plaintiff and Appellant Kay Eckler. Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (California), Ian D. Berg and Takeo A. Kellar; Abraham, Fruchter & Twersky (New York), Mitchell M.Z. Twersky (pro hac vice) and Lawrence D. Levit (pro hac vice) for Plaintiff and Appellant Steve Engel. O’Melveny & Myers (Los…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.