Elsie Hamman v. United States of America and Washington Iron Works, Arlene Hartung Reed, Etc. v. United States of America and Washington Iron Works, Anna Loyning, Etc. v. United States of America and Washington Iron Works

399 F.2d 673 Elsie HAMMAN, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and Washington Iron Works, et al., Appellees. Arlene Hartung REED, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and Washington Iron Works, et al., Appellees. Anna LOYNING, etc., Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America and Washington Iron Works, et al., Appellees. Nos. 21986, 21986-A, 21986-B. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Aug. 22, 1968. Harry M. Philo (argued), Muskegon, Mich., Lee Overfelt, Billings, Mont., J. H. McAlear, Red Lodge, Mont., Philo, Maki, Moore, Pitts, Ravitz, Glotta, Cockrell & Robb, Detroit, Mich., for appellants. Robert E. Burns (argued), of Crimmins, Kent, Bradley & Burns, San Francisco, Cal., Weymouth D. Symmes of Anderson, Symmes, Forbes, Peete & Brown; Cooke, Moulton, Bellingham, Longo & Mather, Billings, Mont., Moody Brickett, U.S Atty., Butte, Mont., for appellees. Before BARNES and MERRILL, Circuit Judges, and 1 BOWEN, District judge. BARNES, Circuit Judge: 1 Three cases are before this court, consolidated on appeal, from a summary judgment dismissing Count III of plaintiffs' respective Third Amended Complaints, for failure to state a cause of action under the…