Marriage of Straw CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 6, 2015C072933California5,099 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/6/15 Marriage of Straw CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(El Dorado)

In re the Marriage of JASON ADAM and C072933

DARCI ALICE STRAW.

JASON ADAM STRAW, (Super. Ct. No.

PFL 20100840)

Appellant,

v.

DARCI ALICE STRAW,

Respondent.

Jason Adam Straw (husband) appeals from an order requiring him to pay $40,000 in pendente lite attorney fees and costs “forthwith” to Darci Alice Straw (wife). (Fam. Code, § 2030.)1 Husband’s primary contention on appeal is that the trial court abused its discretion in ordering him to pay the fees because “[a]fter deducting [his] court ordered support obligations [($23,500)] from his monthly income, it was undisputed that there were zero dollars remaining…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.