Medeiros

Medeiros v. George Hills Company, Inc. CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2015C076021California2,512 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/7/15 Medeiros v. George Hills Company, Inc. CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THOMAS MEDEIROS, C076021

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 34-2010-00070076-CU-FR-GDS) v.

GEORGE HILLS COMPANY, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

Defendant George Hills Company, Inc. (George Hills), is the administrator for the City of Palo Alto (the City), processing claims against the City under the Government Claims Act (Gov. Code, § 810 et seq.).1 Plaintiff Thomas Medeiros had previously alleged that employees of George Hills falsely represented in a letter to him that his claim against the City was untimely. The letter was accompanied by a notice of late claim (§ 911.3, subd. (a)) that did not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.