People v. Smith CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2015H040165California2,471 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND2

“Salinas Police Officer Raphael Villalvaso responded to the scene of a shooting. He stopped a van driven by Jesse Ballesteros. Ballesteros carried three passengers: Humberto Estrada; Mondo [sic][3] Levario; and [Smith]. Officer Villalvaso asked Ballesteros whether any weapons or narcotics were in the van. Ballesteros said ‘maybe’ and ‘there might be a gun in the car’ and then consented to a search of the van. Officer Villalvaso found a loaded gun under the right front seat. In an interview, Ballesteros told Officer Villalvaso that, when the van was stopped, [Smith] exclaimed, ‘[O]h, shit, I have a gun.’ “Ballesteros visited [Smith] in jail after [Smith] had telephoned Ballesteros’s mother. [¶] . . . [¶] “In his testimony, Ballesteros admitted knowing [Smith] for six to eight years and becoming friends with him; he denied making the statements to Officer Villalvaso which

2 We take the facts of Smith’s underlying conviction from our opinion in his prior appeal (People v. Smith (Oct. 8, 1999, H018396) [nonpub. opn.]), and from the record in that appeal, of which we take judicial notice. (Evid. Code, §§ 452, subd. (d), 459, subd. (a).) 3…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.