D and S Homes v. Ludlow CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 7, 2015B257783California5,641 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/7/15 D and S Homes v. Ludlow CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

D AND S HOMES, INC., B257783

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. LC100734) v.

JEFFREY LUDLOW et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. John P. Farrell, Judge. Reversed with directions. Henrichs Law Firm, John Henrichs for Plaintiff and Respondent. Ray B. Bowen, Jr., for Defendants and Appellants. D and S Homes, Inc., a California Corporation (D & S), filed this malicious prosecution action against Edmundo Bustamante and Tiffany Bustamante (the Bustamantes), Ray B. Bowen, Jr. (Bowen), and Jeffery Ludlow (Ludlow). The Bustamantes had sued…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.