J. Howard Arnold v. William J. McGuiness
400 F.2d 392
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 23, 196821814_1California114 words
Opinion
We have carefully considered appellant’s assignments of error and they have no merit. We agree with and adopt the decision of the district court. We also reaffirm this Court’s prior decisions, wherein J. Howard Arnold was twice before this Court as the appellant.
Affirmed.
. See Memorandum and Order filed February 2, 1967, Arnold v. McGuiness, U.S. D.O. N.D.Calif., 289 F.Supp. 210 . . See Arnold v. Bostick, 9 Cir., 1964, 339 F.2d 879 , cert. den. 382 U.S. 858 , 86 S. Ct. 113 , 15 L.Ed.2d 96 ; unreported Order in Arnold v. McGuiness, 9 Cir., 1966, No. 20617, cert. den. 386 U.S. 996 , 87 S.Ct. 1315 , 18 D.Ed.2d 343.