Sherman
Sherman v. Hennessy Industries
Opinion
Opinion
Manella, J.
Filed 7/8/15 Unmodified version attached
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION FOUR
B252566
MICHAEL SHERMAN et al., (Los Angeles County Plaintiffs and Appellants, Super. Ct. No. JCCP4674) v.
HENNESSY INDUSTRIES, INC., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
Defendant and Respondent. AND DENYING PETITION FOR
REHEARING
[NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT:*
It is ordered that the opinion filed herein on June 18, 2015 be modified as follows: On page 14, line 13, delete the sentence beginning with “Although” and substitute the following sentence: According to Levin, unconventional metallic brake “pads” were offered for use on a later Corvette model, but the AMMCO machine was not designed for use on such pads, which required no grinding. The petition for rehearing by respondent Hennessey Industries, Inc. is denied. The modification does not change the judgment. _________________________________________________________________ *EPSTEIN, P. J. MANELLA, J. WILLHITE, J. Filed 6/18/