People v. Degroat CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 9, 2015C076675California2,468 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/9/15 P. v. Degroat CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COPY

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Shasta) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076675

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F7304)

v.

DANIEL LEE DEGROAT,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Daniel Lee Degroat appeals the trial court’s order denying his motion to withdraw his guilty plea. (Pen. Code, § 1018.)1 He contends the trial court abused its discretion because it failed to recognize that defendant accepted the plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel. Specifically, defendant alleges his trial counsel was

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

1 deficient in advising him to admit a prior conviction in Oregon as a strike under California law…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.