Mitchell v. Delphinus Engineering, Inc. CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
INTRODUCTION
Robbie Mitchell appeals from summary judgment in favor of Delphinus
Engineering, Inc. (Delphinus) on his claims for disability discrimination, failure to
prevent discrimination, and wrongful termination. He contends the court erred in
determining he had not met his burden of establishing a triable issue of material fact as to
whether his heart condition limited a major life activity sufficient to constitute a physical
disability and as to whether Delphinus discharged him because of his heart condition.
We conclude Mitchell was not required to present evidence his heart condition
limited a major life activity because heart disease constitutes a physical disability as a
matter of law under the California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) (Gov.
Code, § 12900 et seq.). We further conclude there is a triable issue of material fact as to
whether Delphinus discharged Mitchell because of his heart condition versus his
unsatisfactory job performance. We, therefore, reverse the judgment and remand the
matter to the trial court for further proceedings.
BACKGROUND
Mitchell has a heart condition. His employer, Delphinus, knew about his heart
condition because…