People v. Avila CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 14, 2015H040481California5,729 words

Opinion

Opinion

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Fernando Zosimo Barrios Avila appeals after a jury convicted him of aggravated sexual assault of a child and attempted aggravated sexual assault of a child. (Pen. Code, §§ 269, 664/269.)1 The trial court imposed a term of 15 years to life for aggravated sexual assault of a child and a consecutive five-year term for attempted aggravated sexual assault of a child, and it ordered that defendant’s parole term be “for life” pursuant to former section 3000.1. On appeal, defendant contends: (1) child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome (CSAAS) evidence should be inadmissible for all purposes; (2) CALCRIM No. 1193 erroneously informs the jury that it may consider a CSAAS expert’s testimony in

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise indicated. determining the child witness’s credibility; (3) the prosecutor committed misconduct and trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object; and (4) the trial court erroneously imposed a lifetime parole obligation on defendant. We will affirm the judgment.

II. BACKGROUND

Isabella Doe was born in 1998. In 2004, her mother, Heather P., married defendant, making him Isabella’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.