People v. Smock CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 15, 2015C076711California2,887 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/15/15 P. v. Smock CA3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT

(Sacramento) ----

THE PEOPLE, C076711

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. 13F07899)

v.

WILLIAM SMOCK,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant William Smock appeals from a judgment of conviction following a jury trial. Together with codefendant Shanie Phillips, defendant was charged with two counts of second degree robbery (Pen. Code, § 211 (Counts One and Two))1 related to an Estes2 robbery of merchandise from Sears. In association with Counts One and Two, defendant

1 Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code in effect at the time of the charged offenses. People v. Estes (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 23.

1 was separately…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.