People v. Anderson CA4/1
Opinion
Opinion
Nares, J.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant Kenneth Jerome Anderson is serving, as a third strike recidivist
offender, an aggregate state prison sentence of 81 years to life imposed in 1996 under the pre-Proposition 36 version of California's Three Strikes law (Pen. Code,1 §§ 667, subds.
(b)–(i), 1170.12, subds. (a)–(d)). He appeals an order denying his post-Proposition
petition under section 1170.126 in which he requested that two of the three consecutive
25-year-to-life sentences that are included in his aggregate sentence be recalled and that
he be resentenced as a second strike offender.
As this appeal involves the interpretation of Proposition 36, and in order to
provide necessary context in framing the issue presented, we must first explain the
pertinent provisions of Proposition 36 and summarize relevant portions of the procedural
background of this case.
Overview of Proposition
In Teal v. Superior Court (2014) 60 Cal.4th 595, 596-597 (Teal), the California
Supreme Court succinctly explained the relevant provisions of Proposition 36 and the
petition procedure at issue here for recalling a sentence imposed under the pre-