Young

Young v. Bhakta CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 16, 2015G049734California3,518 words

Opinion

Opinion

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The parties own single family homes on adjacent lots in a planned community with a homeowners’ association (HOA). The lots overlap and the owners have reciprocal easements for the front and rear yards. Two sets of CC&Rs burden the properties: one relates to the entire community (DCC&Rs) and the other is specific to the tract where the parties’ lots are

2 located (TCC&Rs). The HOA also provides Architectural Guidelines overseen by an Architectural Committee. The TCC&Rs authorize the Bhaktas, as the dominant owners, to use their rear yard easement only for recreational and gardening purposes, which they may landscape subject to the Architectural Committee’s approval. (TCC&R 4.3.4.) They may not plant or landscape in a manner that would “impair or otherwise threaten the structural integrity of any adjacent Residence.” (TCC&R 4.3.4.) Nor may they “permit or suffer anything . . . to be done to [the ZLL] Wall which would tend to damage, alter or impair the structural integrity of such Wall. Further, [they] shall not, under any circumstances, plant any tree, shrub or other landscaping, or build, erect or otherwise install any improvement of any kind…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.