Paulek

Paulek v. Western Riverside Co. Regional Conservation Auth.

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2015E059133MCalifornia13,912 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/17/15 (unmodified opn. attached)

CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

ALBERT THOMAS PAULEK,

Plaintiff and Appellant, E059133

v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1203353)

WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDER MODIFYING

REGIONAL CONSERVATION OPINION AND DENYING

AUTHORITY, PETITIONS FOR REHEARING

Defendant and Respondent; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]

ANHEUSER-BUSCH, LLC,

Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

The petitions for rehearing are denied. The opinion filed in this matter on June

17, 2015, is modified as follows:

1. On page 28, in subsection 2, the middle of the second paragraph second

paragraph starting “An agency is precluded” and to the end of the paragraph is deleted

and the following is inserted in its place:

1 CEQA applies if there is substantial evidence a project may have a

significant effect on the environment. (Berkeley Hillside Preservation v.

City of Berkeley (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086, 1098…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.