Paulek
Paulek v. Western Riverside Co. Regional Conservation Auth.
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 17, 2015E059133MCalifornia13,912 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/17/15 (unmodified opn. attached)
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
ALBERT THOMAS PAULEK,
Plaintiff and Appellant, E059133
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIC1203353)
WESTERN RIVERSIDE COUNTY ORDER MODIFYING
REGIONAL CONSERVATION OPINION AND DENYING
AUTHORITY, PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
Defendant and Respondent; [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
ANHEUSER-BUSCH, LLC,
Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
The petitions for rehearing are denied. The opinion filed in this matter on June
17, 2015, is modified as follows:
1. On page 28, in subsection 2, the middle of the second paragraph second
paragraph starting “An agency is precluded” and to the end of the paragraph is deleted
and the following is inserted in its place:
1 CEQA applies if there is substantial evidence a project may have a
significant effect on the environment. (Berkeley Hillside Preservation v.
City of Berkeley (2015) 60 Cal.4th 1086, 1098…