United States v. Jewel Aquino

Good Law
794 F.3d 1033·2015 WL 4394869·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12486
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 201514-10360California2,735 words

Opinion

Opinion

Owens, J.

Appellant Jewel Aquino challenges (1) the district court’s finding that she lied to her probation officer when she denied using any “illicit drugs” and (2) a special condition of supervised release that prohibits her from knowingly using or possessing any substance that she “believe[s] is intended to mimic” the effects of a controlled substance. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate Aquino’s sentence and remand for resen-tencing.

I. FACTS

Aquino pleaded guilty to one count of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1591 (a)(1), (b)(2), and was sentenced to thirty-three months of incarceration followed by three years of supervised release with numerous standard and special conditions. Standard Condition No. 3 required Aquino to “answer truthfully all inquiries by the probation officer.”

Upon release from prison, Aquino did poorly on supervised release, with a series of violations in 2013 (including a violation of Standard Condition No. 3). The district court sentenced her to nine months’ imprisonment, followed by twenty-four months of supervised release. •

Aquino stumbled again in 2014. On May 28, 2014, her probation officer called her about a missed mandatory…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.