United States v. Dennis Mahon

Good Law
793 F.3d 1115·2015 WL 4393741·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 12483
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 201512-10273California2,930 words

Opinion

Opinion

Owens, J.

Dennis Mahon appeals his convictions under 18 U.S.C. §§ 844 (i) and (n) for the pipe bomb explosion at the City of Scottsdale Office of Diversity and Dialogue (“Diversity Office”), which injured three people and damaged property. Section 844(i) makes it a crime to damage or destroy, by means of an explosive, property that is “used in” interstate commerce or in “activity affecting” interstate commerce. Ma-hon contends his convictions are invalid because the Diversity Office’s activities did not satisfy the statute’s interstate commerce requirement. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. The Diversity Office was property “used in” commerce or in “activity affecting” commerce.

A concurrently filed memorandum disposition addresses Mahon’s other claims.

I. FACTS

A. The Diversity Office

Scottsdale created the Diversity Office to, among other things, promote the city as a “tourist destination.” One of the first of its kind in the country, it engaged in community outreach with businesses and cultivated relationships with local, national, and international organizations.

Housed in the city’s Human Resources building, the Diversity Office worked with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.