Even Zohar Construction & Remodeling, Inc. v. Bellaire Townhouses, LLC

Bad Law
189 Cal. Rptr. 3d 824·2015 Cal. LEXIS 5114·61 Cal. 4th 830·352 P.3d 391
Supreme Court of CaliforniaJuly 20, 2015S210804California5,606 words

Opinion

Opinion

Werdegar, J.

Code of Civil Procedure section 1008 imposes special requirements on renewed applications for orders a court has previously refused. A party filing a renewed application must, among other things, submit an affidavit showing what “new or different facts, circumstances, or law are claimed” (id., subd. (b)) to justify the renewed application, and show diligence with a satisfactory explanation for not presenting the new or different information earlier (California Correctional Peace Officers Assn. v. Virga (2010) 181 Cal.App.4th 30 , 45-46 & fns. 14-15 [ 103 Cal.Rptr.3d 699 ]; see Garcia v. Hejmadi (1997) 58 Cal.App.4th 674, 688-690 [ 68 Cal.Rptr.2d 228 ]). Section 1008 by its terms “applies to all applications ... for the renewal of a previous motion” and “specifies the court’s jurisdiction with regard to [such] applications.” (§ 1008, subd. (e).) This case raises the question whether section 1008 governs renewed applications under section 473, subdivision (b) (section 473(b)), for relief from default based on an attorney’s “sworn affidavit attesting to his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or neglect” (ibid.). We conclude section 1008 does govern such applications.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.