The Sombrero, Inc. v. Markel International Ins. Co. CA4/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 20, 2015E060705California1,240 words

Opinion

Opinion

INTRODUCTION

Thee Sombrero Inc. (Thee Sombrero) owns commercial real property in Colton.

Defendant and respondent, Markel International Insurance Company, Ltd. (Markel), was

the insurer for Thee Sombrero under an insurance policy. Harry W. Gorst Co., Inc.

(Gorst) is an insurance broker. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary

judgment on the Thee Sombrero’s belated 2012 lawsuit for insurance coverage for

damages caused by vandalism in 2007. In the absence of any disputed material facts, we

affirm the judgment.

II

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

The parties’ separate statements established the following undisputed material

facts. Thee Sombrero owns commercial real property and personal property in Colton.

Markel is a surplus lines insurer. Gorst is a surplus lines insurance broker.

Thee Sombrero’s insurance broker, RISCO Insurance Services, Inc. (RISCO),

directed Gorst to procure a commercial insurance policy for Thee Sombrero. Gorst

obtained a policy from Markel which was effective from February 2007 to February

RISCO is not a party.

2 2008. Gorst delivered the policy to RISCO and RISCO forwarded the policy to Thee

Sombrero in June 2007. Its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.