People v. Ibrahim CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2015D067002California197 words

Opinion

Opinion

Huffman, J.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

A witness testified that he saw Ibrahim arguing with the victim on the night of the

offense, and the witness tried to break up the argument. The witness testified that he later

2 saw Ibrahim straddling the victim and punching him in the face with a closed fist. The

witness called 9-1-1 and when police arrived took them to the victim who was seriously

injured. Ibrahim made statements to police that he had been arguing with the victim and

was trying to protect himself.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, counsel has filed a brief pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d

436, asking this court to review the record for error. Pursuant to Anders v. California

(1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified the following possible, but not

reasonably arguable issue for our consideration:

Whether the trial court abused its discretion in selecting the upper term for the

assault count?

We have reviewed the entire record pursuant to Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d 436, and

Anders, supra, 386 U.S. 728, and have not discovered any reasonably arguable issues for

reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented Ibrahim on this appeal.

DISPOSITION

The judgment is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.