Barham Construction v. City of Riverbank CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 21, 2015F068373California8,157 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/21/15 Barham Construction v. City of Riverbank CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

BARHAM CONSTRUCTION, INC., et al.,

F068373

Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v. (Super. Ct. No. 350298)

CITY OF RIVERBANK,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant. OPINION

BARHAM CONSTRUCTION, INC., F068914 Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Respondent, v.

CITY OF RIVERBANK,

Defendant, Cross-complainant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment and orders of the Superior Court of Stanislaus County. Roger M. Beauchesne, Judge. Costanzo & Associates and Neal E. Costanzo for Defendant, Cross-complainant and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.