Stormans Inc v. John Wiesman

Good Law
794 F.3d 1064·2015 WL 4478084
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 23, 201512-35221, 12-35223California9,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

Graber, J.

In order to promote patient safety in the state of Washington, the Washington Pharmacy Quality Assurance Commission (“Commission”) promulgated rules requiring the timely delivery of all prescription medications by licensed pharmacies. The rules permit pharmacies to deny delivery for certain business reasons, such as fraudulent prescriptions or a customer’s inability to pay: The rules also permit a religiously objecting individual pharmacist to deny delivery, so long as another pharmacist working for the pharmacy provides timely delivery. But, unless an enumerated exemption applies, the rules require a pharmacy to deliver all prescription medications, even if the owner of the pharmacy has a religous objection.

Plaintiffs are the owner of a pharmacy and two individual pharmacists who have religous objections to delivering emergency contraceptives such as Plan B and ella. They challenge the rules on free exercise and other constitutional gounds. After a bench trial, the district court held that the rules violate the Free Exercise and Equal Protection Clauses, and the court permanently enjoined enforcement of the rules. Because we conclude that the rules are neutral and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.