United States v. Joseph Carozza

Good Law
608 F. App'x 532
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 24, 201513-10172, 13-10179, 13-10198California1,818 words

Opinion

Opinion

ORDER

The memorandum disposition filed on April 14, 2015, is hereby amended and replaced by the amended memorandum disposition filed concurrently with this order. With these amendments, the panel has voted to deny the petition for panel rehearing and to deny the petition for rehearing en banc.

The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc, and no judge of the court has requested a vote on the petition. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for panel rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc are DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc shall be permitted.

AMENDED MEMORANDUM

Defendants-Appellants Chris Napoli, Daniel Johnson, and Joseph Carozza (“Defendants”) appeal their convictions for conspiracy to distribute and possess with in tent to distribute Schedule III and IV controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 , and possession with intent to distribute a Schedule IV controlled substance in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1), (b)(2), arising out of the operation of an internet pharmacy. Napoli and Johnson also appeal their convictions for conspiracy to launder money in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(2)(A), (h).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.