People v. Feeter CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2015H039750California4,034 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/15 P. v. Feeter CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H039750

(Santa Cruz County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. F22273)

v.

CHRISTINE ELLEN FEETER,

Defendant and Appellant.

Following a jury trial, defendant Christine Feeter was convicted of burglary (Pen. Code, § 459), 1 stalking (§ 646.9, subd. (a)), and contempt of court (§ 166, subd. (c)(1).) On appeal, defendant asserts the trial court erred in failing to give a unanimity instruction for the burglary charge, and in sentencing defendant separately for the stalking and contempt of court charges.

STATEMENT OF THE FACTS AND CASE

The present case stems from the failed relationship of the victim, and her former husband,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.