In re Ferguson CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2015D067284California2,122 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/15 In re Ferguson CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL - FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

In re KENNETH MICHAEL FERGUSON D067284

on

Habeas Corpus.

Original proceeding on a petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petition dismissed as

moot.

Law Office of Marc Eric Norton and Marc Eric Norton for Petitioner.

Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Jennifer A. Neill, Assistant Attorney

General, Phillip J. Lindsay and Gregory J. Marcot, Deputy Attorneys General, for

Respondent.

In 2014, the Board of Parole Hearings (Board) found that Kenneth Michael

Ferguson did not pose an unreasonable risk to society and was suitable for parole. The

Governor requested that the Board review the decision en banc. (Pen. Code, § 3041.1,

undesignated statutory references are to this code.) After its en…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.