Fidelman

Fidelman v. JP Morgan Chase CA2/4

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 24, 2015B256068California3,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/24/15 Fidelman v. JP Morgan Chase CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

DEBORAH BECK FIDELMAN, B256068

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. PC054891) v.

JP MORGAN CHASE, N.A., et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Melvin D. Sandvig, Judge. Affirmed. Rodriguez Law Group, Patricia Rodriguez and George M. Hill for Plaintiff and Appellant. Parker Ibrahim & Berg, John M. Sorich, and Chanel L. Oldham for Defendants and Respondents.

______________________________ Plaintiff Deborah Beck Fidelman appeals from a judgment of dismissal after a demurrer to her first amended complaint (FAC) by Defendants JP Morgan Chase…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.