People v. Jewell CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
The Board of Parole Hearings (the Board) has twice recommended that the
superior court recall defendant Dennis Lloyd Jewell’s sentence and grant him a
compassionate release under Penal Code1 section 1170, subdivision (e). Both times, the
Board concluded defendant was terminally ill with an incurable disease that will kill him
within six months, and that the conditions of his release would not pose a threat to the
public.
The trial court denied the Board’s first recommendation because it concluded the
record did not contain evidence that defendant would actually die within six months. The
trial court also concluded that, because defendant’s postrelease plan changed after the
Board’s recommendation, it could not conclude that releasing Jewell would pose no risk
to the public. In our first opinion, we held the trial court applied too rigid a standard for
determining whether defendant would die within six months, and concluded the record
amply supported the Board’s medical conclusion. (People v. Jewell (June 12, 2014,
E059455) [nonpub. opn.].) However, because neither the Board nor the trial court had
considered defendant’s new postrelease plan, we…