Gentile

Gentile v. Keenan & Assocs. CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 27, 2015B253097California9,155 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/27/15 Gentile v. Keenan & Assocs. CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

ANNA MARIE GENTILE, B253097

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC471005) v.

KEENAN & ASSOCIATES,

Defendant and Respondent.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michelle R. Rosenblatt, Judge. Affirmed. Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik, Norman B. Blumenthal, Kyle R. Nordrehaug and Aparajit Bhowmik, for Plaintiff and Appellant. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton, Richard J. Simmons, Daniel J. McQueen and Won B. Kim, for Defendant and Respondent.

_________________________ Plaintiff Anna Marie Gentile (plaintiff), a former workers’ compensation claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.