Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers Local Union 524 v. D. S. Billington

Good Law
402 F.2d 510·69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2637·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5121
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 28, 196822046California1,625 words

Opinion

Opinion

402 F.2d 510 TEAMSTERS, CHAUFFEURS, WAREHOUSEMEN & HELPERS LOCAL UNION 524, etc., Appellants, v. D. S. BILLINGTON, d/b/a Billington Builders Supply and Billington Builders Supply, Inc., Appellee. No. 22046. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 28, 1968. George H. Davies (argued), of Vance, Davies, Roberts & Bettis, Seattle, Wash., for appellants. Perry J. Robinson, Yakima, Wash., for appellee. Before MERRILL and CARTER, Circuit Judges, and WHELAN, * District Judge. JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge. 1 This is an action for specific performance of an arbitration clause in a collective bargaining agreement. The appeal raises the following question: Whether the employer was bound by the offer of a purported agent made to the union for a collective bargaining agreement which the union claims it accepted. 1 2 The appellant, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Local 524 (hereafter the Union), commenced the action below against D. S. Billington, an individual doing business as Billington Builders Supply (hereafter Billington) and Billington Builders Supply, Inc. (hereafter Billington Corporation), to compel specific performance of an arbitration clause…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.