People v. Jackson CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2015C076206California1,612 words

Opinion

Opinion

BACKGROUND

In light of the limited nature of defendant’s claims, a detailed recitation of the facts underlying his convictions is unnecessary. Additional background regarding sentencing will be set forth in the discussion as relevant to the contentions on appeal. A jury found defendant guilty of assault with a deadly weapon (§ 245, subd. (b) -- count 2), negligent discharge of a firearm (§ 246.3 -- count 3), two counts of possession of a firearm within 10 years of a domestic violence conviction (§ 29805 -- counts 4 and 11), three counts of second degree robbery (§ 211 -- counts 5, 7, and 8), fraudulent use of another’s identity (§ 530.5, subd. (a) -- count 6), and carrying a concealed firearm in a vehicle (§ 25400, subd. (a)(1) -- count 9). The jury also found true the following special allegations: as to count 2, that defendant personally used a semi-automatic firearm (§ 12022.5, subd. (a)); as to counts 7 and 8, that defendant personally used a firearm

Undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.

2 (§ 12022.53, subd. (b)); and as to count 9, that defendant was not the registered owner of the firearm (§ 25400, subd. (c)(6)). The probation report recommended an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.