People v. Banks CA1/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2015A139907California3,602 words

Opinion

Opinion

Dondero, J.

INTRODUCTION

After entering a motel room through a window in the early morning hours of December 4, 2010, defendant severely beat and then sexually assaulted the young woman asleep there. A jury convicted him of assault with intent to commit oral copulation during a burglary, and burglary, among other offenses. On appeal, defendant argues he cannot be convicted of both assault with intent to commit oral copulation during a burglary, and burglary, because the latter offense is a necessarily included lesser offense of the former. The People concede the point and we concur. We reject defendant’s claim of prejudicial prosecutorial misconduct. Accordingly, we will dismiss defendant’s conviction for burglary and otherwise affirm the judgment.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

A jury convicted defendant of assault with intent to commit oral copulation during a burglary, burglary, aggravated assault, attempted oral copulation, and indecent exposure. (Pen. Code, §§ 220, subd. (b), 460, subd. (a), 245, subd. (a)(1), 288a, subd. (c)(2)/664, 314.)1 The jury also returned great bodily injury findings. (§§ 12022.7, 12022.8, 1203.075.) A separate count of dissuading a witness (§ 136.1) was dismissed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.