United States v. Jusaino-Gomez
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Gonzalo Jusaino-Gomez appeals his jury-trial conviction and 92-month sentence for reentry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 , and the revocation of supervised release and 12-month consecutive sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 , 87 S.Ct. 1396 , 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Jusaino-Gomez’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Jusaino-Gomez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 , 109 S.Ct. 346 , 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief. We, therefore, affirm Jusaino-Gomez’s conviction and sentence in Appeal No. 13-10332, and the revocation of supervised release and sentence in Appeal No. 13-10331.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.