People v. Tamez CA5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 28, 2015F068488California9,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

Detjen, J.

Filed 7/28/15 P. v. Tamez CA5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE,

F068488

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Super. Ct. No. VCF228485) v.

RICHARD TREVINO TAMEZ, OPINION Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County. Gary L. Paden, Judge. A.M. Weisman, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Michael P. Farrell, Assistant Attorney General, Eric L. Christoffersen and Sally Espinoza, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent. -ooOoo- In December 2009, defendant Richard Trevino Tamez was charged with committing a forcible lewd or lascivious act upon Steven,1 a child under the age of 14 (Pen. Code,2 § 288, subd.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.