People v. Fredrick CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2015D067448California16,603 words

Opinion

Opinion

Mcdonald, J.

FACTS

A. The Evidence Concerning the Underlying Offenses

Frank S., the victim of many of the offenses, met Ms. Wilson in June 2010 and

they had a dating relationship for a few months. About a week before the crimes, Frank

took Wilson to a family reunion during which he told her he would be receiving an

inheritance of approximately $22,000.

186.22, subdivision (b), enhancement appended to count four as to all defendants in connection with count four and that Fredrick personally used a firearm in connection with count four; (5) committed a residential burglary of Shontae P.'s home (§ 459, count six) and found true the section 186.22, subdivision (b), enhancement appended to count six as to all defendants; (6) attempted robbery of Shontae P. (§§ 664/211, count seven) and found true the section 186.22, subdivision (b), enhancement appended to count seven as to all defendants; and (7) that defendants actively participated in a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (a), count eight). Stafford was also charged with two "prison priors" (§ 667.5, subd. (b)), which were bifurcated; at sentencing and pursuant to an agreement between the parties, Stafford admitted one of the prison…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.