Marriage of Johns CA3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2015C074271California858 words

Opinion

Opinion

DISCUSSION

The postjudgment order from which mother appeals, issued following a contested hearing in the trial court. The appellate record, however, does not include a reporter’s transcript from that hearing, and no reporter is noted in the minute order.1 Therefore, we treat this as an appeal on the judgment roll. (Allen v. Toten (1985) 172 Cal.App.3d 1079, 1082-1083 (Allen); Krueger v. Bank of America (1983) 145 Cal.App.3d 204, 207.) The limited record we have establishes that a judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage was entered on December 14, 2011. Included in that judgment was a stipulated custody order. Father moved to modify that stipulated custody order in January 2012, and on March 14, 2012, the trial court granted father’s motion - adopting the family court services recommended parenting plan. On November 9, 2012, father filed a motion to modify the March 14, 2012, custody order. Mother opposed the motion and the trial court presided over a contested hearing on March 28, 2013. Following that hearing, the trial court granted father’s motion. The court continued the order for joint custody but modified the parenting and holiday schedules. The court also ruled that this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.