Schwartz

Schwartz v. Spillard CA1/2

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 29, 2015A141071California4,208 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/29/15 Schwartz v. Spillard CA1/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION TWO

MEGAN SCHWARTZ,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

A141071

v. EVERETT SPILLARD, (Humboldt County Super. Ct. No. FL100538) Defendant and Appellant.

This is an appeal from a domestic violence restraining order (Fam. Code, § 6250 et seq.) 1 obtained by Megan Schwartz against appellant, Everett Spillard. Schwartz and Spillard never married but formerly lived together and have a son, born in August 2006. The child is the subject of a dispute between the parties regarding custody and visitation that commenced prior to the time Schwartz sought a restraining order under the Domestic Violence Prevention Act (DVPA). (§ 6200 et seq.) As will be seen, Spillard’s briefs, which he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.