People v. Patterson CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 30, 2015H039022California2,678 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 7/30/15 P. v. Patterson CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

THE PEOPLE, H039022

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Respondent, Super. Ct. No. F1139615)

v.

LLOYD TARIAL PATTERSON,

Defendant and Appellant.

Defendant Lloyd Tarial Patterson appeals from a grand theft conviction. On appeal, defendant asserts that the trial court erred in denying his motion to withdraw his no contest plea. As set forth below, we will affirm.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

James Currier, the victim of the theft, owns a company called Flowstar. Flowstar has a Gilroy warehouse. Currier and defendant worked together to start a homeless shelter called the Gilroy Compassion Center (hereafter the “GCC”). The GCC is adjacent to the Flowstar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.