Aimee Greene v. Buckeye Valley Fire Dept

Good Law
625 F. App'x 319
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 30, 201513-16102California840 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Plaintiff Aimee- Greene sued Buckeye Valley Fire Department and its individual officers (“Defendants”) under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, alleging gender discrimination and. retaliation, and under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging denial of equal protection. The district court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff appeals. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Reviewing de novo, Vasquez v. County of Los Angeles, 349 F.3d 634, 639 (9th Cir.2004), we affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

1. The district court did not err when it concluded that Plaintiffs Title VII claims arising out of “discrete acts of discrimination” that occurred before February 3, 2010, are time-barred. See Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp. v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101, 105 , 122 S.Ct. 2061 , 153 L.Ed.2d 106 (2002) (stating rule). The district court properly applied 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(e)(1), which sets forth the relevant , limitations period. Alleged discriminatory acts that occurred before February 3, 2010, may, however, be used as background evidence to support Plaintiffs timely claims. Morgan, 536 U.S. at 113 , 122 S.Ct. 2061 .

Moreover, Plaintiff may sue…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.