Wilmot v. Doyle

Good Law
403 F.2d 811·69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2646·1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5082
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 30, 196822297California2,832 words

Opinion

Opinion

403 F.2d 811 Ralph WILMOT, Counsel for the General Counsel of the National Labor Relations Board, Appellant, v. David DOYLE, National Labor Relations Board Trial Examiner, on relation of Local 959, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, etc., and Grocers Wholesale, Inc., Appellees. No. 22297. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. October 30, 1968. Solomon I. Hirsh (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Wm. H. Garder, Atty., Washington, D. C., for appellant. Richard P. Donaldson (argued) of Bassett, Donaldson & Hafer, Seattle, Wash., D. A. Burr (argued) of Burr, Boney & Pease, Anchorage, Alaska, for appellees. Alfred J. Schweppe and Mary Ellen Krug, of Schweppe, Doolittle, Krug & Tausend, Seattle, Wash., for intervenor. Before BROWNING, DUNIWAY and CARTER, Circuit Judges. JAMES M. CARTER, Circuit Judge. 1 This is an appeal from two orders of the district court, (1) granting the petition of David Doyle on relation of Local 959, of the International Brotherhood of Teamsters, (hereafter the Union) to enforce a subpena duces tecum, and (2) subsequently adjudging in contempt Ralph…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.