Nru
Nru v. Ferc
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 10, 201513-70391California5,520 words
Opinion
Opinion
Hurwitz, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NORTHWEST REQUIREMENTS No. 13-70391
UTILITIES; PUBLIC POWER COUNCIL;
THE CITY OF SEATTLE, FERC Nos. Petitioners, EL11-44-000
EL11-44-001
POWEREX CORPORATION;
SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY
DISTRICT; TURLOCK IRRIGATION
DISTRICT; AVISTA CORPORATION;
CANNON POWER CORPORATION,
CAITHNESS SHEPHERDS FLAT, LLC; E.
ON CLIMATE & RENEWABLES NORTH
AMERICA LLC; EURUS COMBINE
HILLS II LLC; IBERDROLA
RENEWABLES, LLC; M-S-R PUBLIC
POWER AGENCY; NORTHWEST
UTILITIES; PUGET SOUND ENERGY,
INC.; PACIFICORP; PORTLAND
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY;
PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1 OF
SNOHOMISH COUNTY, WASHINGTON;
PPL MONTANA, LLC; CHARLES PACE,
Intervenors, v.
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY
COMMISSION,
Respondent.
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC No. 13-70499
COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION; PACIFIC
NORTHWEST GENERATING FERC Nos.
COOPERATIVE; AMERICAN PUBLIC EL11-44-000
POWER ASSOCIATION, EL11-44-001
Petitioners,