The Ray Charles Foundation v. Raenee Robinson

Bad Law
795 F.3d 1109·2015 WL 4591871·115 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1739·2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 13363
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 31, 201513-55421California6,581 words

Opinion

Opinion

Christen, J.

When music legend Ray Charles died, he left behind remarkable legacies in music and philanthropy. This appeal arises from the intersection of the two. Seven of Charles’s heirs purported to terminate copyright grants that Charles conferred while he was alive. The Ray Charles Foundation, the sole beneficiary of Charles’s estate, filed suit to challenge the terminations. The district court dismissed the suit for lack of jurisdiction, and the Foundation now appeals. We reverse the dis- . trict court’s order and remand for further proceedings.

BACKGROUND

I. Charles’s Copyright Interests

In the 1950s, Ray Charles Robinson, young and early into his career, entered into several contracts with music publisher Atlantic Records and its subsidiary, Progressive Music Publishing Co. The contracts indicated that Charles was an employee of the publishers, who owned all copyright interests in Charles’s work. Under the contracts, Charles, was entitled to advance payments and future royalties.

By 1980, Charles had achieved considerable success and renown. That year, he renegotiated his copyright grants with Progressive’s successor in interest. The renegotiation pertained to songs…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.