Jiahao Jiang v. Loretta E. Lynch

Good Law
611 F. App'x 476
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 6, 201512-70651California309 words

Opinion

Opinion

MEMORANDUM

Jiahao Jiang and his wife Li Xin Ren petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (BIA) decision denying Jiang’s application for asylum. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252 , and we deny the petition.

Petitioners are citizens of the People’s Republic of China. In 2005, Jiang alleges government authorities destroyed his rabbit farm, which was located on land leased from the government. He also alleges he was removed from the land with force and without notice or compensation. Jiang, along with other villagers who lost their land, attempted to seek compensation for his property from the district government. He alleges he was detained and tortured by the police until he agreed to sign a document giving up all claims to compensation.

Substantial evidence supports the BIA’s determination that, even assuming credibility, Jiang did not establish that “one central reason” for his persecution was “on account of race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.” 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 (42)(A), 1158(b)(l)(B)(i); Sangha v. I.N.S., 103 F.3d 1482, 1487 (9th Cir.1997); Parussimova v. Mukasey, 555 F.3d 734, 739-41 (9th…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.