Felicisima Espinosa v. Loretta E. Lynch
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 4, 201511-72495California291 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION AUG 04 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FELICISIMA ALBIOLA ESPINOSA, No. 11-72495
Petitioner, Agency No. A088-224-046
v.
MEMORANDUM*
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 21, 2015**
Before: CANBY, BEA, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Felicisima Albiola Espinosa, a native and citizen of the Philippines, petitions
for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing her appeal from
an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) removal order. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to continue, and
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). review de novo due process claims. Sandoval-Luna v. Mukasey, 526 F.3d 1243,
1246 (9th Cir.…