Kisling

People v. Kisling

Good Law
190 Cal. Rptr. 3d 800·2015 Cal. App. LEXIS 680·239 Cal. App. 4th 288
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 6, 2015C076047California1,156 words

Opinion

Opinion

Robie, J.

In this case, we address whether People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436 [ 158 Cal.Rptr. 839 , 600 P.2d 1071 ] review applies to an appeal from the denial of a defendant’s petition for release from his commitment as a sexually violent predator. Defendant Richard Kisling appeals from the trial court’s denial of his petitions for unconditional and conditional release from his commitment as a sexually violent predator. (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 6605, 6608.) Appointed counsel for defendant has asked this court to review the record pursuant to Wende to determine whether there exist any arguable issues in defendant’s appeal from the trial court’s order. We asked for supplemental briefing from the parties on whether Wende review applies to appeals from denials of petitions for release from a sexually violent predator commitment. Finding Wende review is inapplicable here, we shall dismiss the appeal.

Wende applies only to “appointed appellate counsel’s representation of an indigent criminal defendant in his first appeal as of right.” (In re Sade C. (1996) 13 Cal.4th 952, 978 [ 55 Cal.Rptr.2d 771 , 920 P.2d 716 ].) Since proceedings under the Sexually Violent Predator Act (SVPA) (§…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.