Riley
People v. Riley
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaJuly 31, 2015E059103MCalifornia5,875 words
Opinion
Opinion
Filed 7/31/15; unmodified opn. attached
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION TWO
THE PEOPLE,
Plaintiff and Respondent, E059103
v. (Super.Ct.No. RIF10000395)
JAMES WILLIAM RILEY et al., ORDER MODIFYING OPINION
Defendants and Appellants. [NO CHANGE IN JUDGMENT]
THE COURT
The opinion filed in this matter on July 21, 2015, is modified as follows:
1 The last sentence beginning on page 6 and continuing on page 7, which reads,
“The total fees and commissions paid to RGA . . . ,” should read: A forensic accountant
who testified for the prosecution stated that the total fees and commissions paid to RGA
on this group of policies amounted to approximately 24.5 percent of the premiums.
On page 7, in footnote No. 5, remove the word “Cooper” and replace it with “The
witness.” The first sentence of footnote No. 5 should read: The witness based his
calculations on net premium, i.e., the gross premium less the commissions and fees.
These modifications do not change the judgment.